Jump to content

To-Do List for Wikidelphia Editors: Difference between revisions

From Wikidelphia
m PaulSank moved page ToDoList to To-Do List for Wikidelphia Editors without leaving a redirect: to make the meaning more explicit
description trimmed
Line 2: Line 2:


*The term "Grassroots" can be searched and [[:Category:Does-Grassroots Activism|<u>Category:Does-Grassroots Activism</u>]] added where appropriate.
*The term "Grassroots" can be searched and [[:Category:Does-Grassroots Activism|<u>Category:Does-Grassroots Activism</u>]] added where appropriate.
**Whoever created this category should have done this as soon as they created it. As for me, I'm not sure what this term means, as opposed to "Does-Activism". Don't all activists aim at the so-called "grassroots"? What other activism is there? Lobbying? You can call that "Does-Lobbying". The word "grassroots" always sounds self-congratulatory to me--"We work the grassroots. Those other people are rich guys and elitists. We're the real people people." OK, so there's my two cents. ~[[User:PaulSank|Paul]]
**I'm not sure what this term means, as opposed to "Does-Activism". Don't all activists aim at the so-called "grassroots"? What other activism is there? Lobbying? You can call that "Does-Lobbying". The word "grassroots" always sounds self-congratulatory to me--"We work the grassroots. Those other people are rich guys and elitists. We're the real people people." OK, so there's my two cents. ~[[User:PaulSank|Paul]]
*The category "Issue-Violence" needs to be adjusted to reflect the fact that groups usually promote "Anti-Violence."
*The category "Issue-Violence" needs to be adjusted to reflect the fact that groups usually promote "Anti-Violence."
**I think "Issue-Violence" is fine as it is. The "Anti-" is understood. Ever see an activist group that '''promotes''' violence? No. Maybe there are some who are "Using-Violence". ~[[User:PaulSank|Paul]]
**I think "Issue-Violence" is fine as it is. The "Anti-" is understood. Ever see an activist group that '''promotes''' violence? No. Maybe there are some who are "Using-Violence". ~[[User:PaulSank|Paul]]
*'''Already In Progress:''' Put neighborhood "Where" categories under the major areas they're a part of. Link all major areas to "Where-Philadelphia". E.g., make "Where-Mount_Airy" appear on both the "Where" and the "Where-Northwest_Philadelphia" lists; make "Where-Northwest_Philadelphia" appear with other major areas on "Where-Philadelphia". This is already happening, a little at a time.


{{W}}
{{W}}

Revision as of 11:40, 5 April 2018

Wikidelphia editors can use this page to share notes about work that can be undertaken.

  • The term "Grassroots" can be searched and Category:Does-Grassroots Activism added where appropriate.
    • I'm not sure what this term means, as opposed to "Does-Activism". Don't all activists aim at the so-called "grassroots"? What other activism is there? Lobbying? You can call that "Does-Lobbying". The word "grassroots" always sounds self-congratulatory to me--"We work the grassroots. Those other people are rich guys and elitists. We're the real people people." OK, so there's my two cents. ~Paul
  • The category "Issue-Violence" needs to be adjusted to reflect the fact that groups usually promote "Anti-Violence."
    • I think "Issue-Violence" is fine as it is. The "Anti-" is understood. Ever see an activist group that promotes violence? No. Maybe there are some who are "Using-Violence". ~Paul