Talk:Museums on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Stan has a valid point - but what will our policy be? |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:It's true that the initial "skeleton" of the page is built around Wikipedia links and museum event webpages. I did that deliberately - my '''question''' being if we could add enough good content onto those existing links to make a unified whole paragraph around each bullet. I wanted to provoke conversation in the Content sub-group about what our policy should be, as opposed to handing them a finished page. | :It's true that the initial "skeleton" of the page is built around Wikipedia links and museum event webpages. I did that deliberately - my '''question''' being if we could add enough good content onto those existing links to make a unified whole paragraph around each bullet. I wanted to provoke conversation in the Content sub-group about what our policy should be, as opposed to handing them a finished page. | ||
:However, I do see your point. Let me see if I can add to this page along the lines above. [[User:Shollingsworth|SteveH]] 16:01, 18 January 2011 (EST) | ::However, I do see your point. Let me see if I can add to this page along the lines above. [[User:Shollingsworth|SteveH]] 16:01, 18 January 2011 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:38, 19 July 2018
Comments on initial structure of the page
Hi, Steve.
It looks as if most of the links on this page should be considered "external."Stan 15:26, 18 January 2011 (EST)
Another thought would be to name this page "Wikipedia articles about Museums on the Ben Franklin Parkway." Then we'd not need to reference any "external" links. Just a thought...--Stan 15:29, 18 January 2011 (EST)
- It's true that the initial "skeleton" of the page is built around Wikipedia links and museum event webpages. I did that deliberately - my question being if we could add enough good content onto those existing links to make a unified whole paragraph around each bullet. I wanted to provoke conversation in the Content sub-group about what our policy should be, as opposed to handing them a finished page.
- However, I do see your point. Let me see if I can add to this page along the lines above. SteveH 16:01, 18 January 2011 (EST)