Integrated~Autonomy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Integrated Autonomy.jpg|thumb]] | |||
{{LS}} | |||
====Move from either-or to robust both-and solutions==== | ====Move from either-or to robust both-and solutions==== | ||
This process seeks to address the possibility of '''opposites''' existing '''simultaneously''' when teams are at work. | |||
*Will our purpose be best served by increased '''local autonomy, customization, competition, and freedom''' among units/sites? | |||
*Or, will our purpose be best served by increased '''integration, standardization, and control''' among units/sites? Or, both? | |||
== Steps == | |||
#Use 1-2-4-All to generate a list of activities that require attention by asking, “Where is there tension between our desire to standardize and the request for more customizing or autonomy?” 10 min. | |||
#Groups examine: What is the rationale for standardizing? What is the rationale for customizing? | |||
#develop a set of action steps that achieve standardization and a set of action steps that achieve customization. | |||
#Ask, “Which actions boost both? | |||
#Ask, “What modifications or creative ideas can be adopted to move some actions between the three groups? | |||
#prioritize the most promising actions that promote both integration and autonomy. | |||
== Info == | |||
*[http://www.liberatingstructures.com/29-integrated-autonomy/ '''Integrated Autonomy''' Field Guide Entry] | |||
*Alt terms: Substitute '''collaboration''' for integration<Br> and '''competition''' for autonomy | |||
[[Category:Is-Liberating Structure]] | [[Category:Is-Liberating Structure]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:36, 2 July 2020
- Liberating Structures List Alpha on Wikidelphia in Alphabetically order
- (Items in the above list that are marked with an asterisk have my notes in them)
- Liberating Structures List on Wikidelphia Using the LS Website's "order of difficulty"
Back to: The Surprising Power Of Liberating Structures
Liberating Structures Graphic Menu
Liberating Structures Matching Matrix
Move from either-or to robust both-and solutions
This process seeks to address the possibility of opposites existing simultaneously when teams are at work.
- Will our purpose be best served by increased local autonomy, customization, competition, and freedom among units/sites?
- Or, will our purpose be best served by increased integration, standardization, and control among units/sites? Or, both?
Steps
- Use 1-2-4-All to generate a list of activities that require attention by asking, “Where is there tension between our desire to standardize and the request for more customizing or autonomy?” 10 min.
- Groups examine: What is the rationale for standardizing? What is the rationale for customizing?
- develop a set of action steps that achieve standardization and a set of action steps that achieve customization.
- Ask, “Which actions boost both?
- Ask, “What modifications or creative ideas can be adopted to move some actions between the three groups?
- prioritize the most promising actions that promote both integration and autonomy.
Info
- Integrated Autonomy Field Guide Entry
- Alt terms: Substitute collaboration for integration
and competition for autonomy