Jump to content

Integrated~Autonomy: Difference between revisions

From Wikidelphia
Line 5: Line 5:
*Will our purpose be best served by increased '''local autonomy, customization, competition, and freedom''' among units/sites?
*Will our purpose be best served by increased '''local autonomy, customization, competition, and freedom''' among units/sites?
*Or, will our purpose be best served by increased '''integration, standardization, and control''' among units/sites? Or, both?
*Or, will our purpose be best served by increased '''integration, standardization, and control''' among units/sites? Or, both?
== Steps ==
#Use 1-2-4-All to generate a list of activities that require attention by asking, “Where is there tension between our desire to standardize and the request for more customizing or autonomy?” 10 min.


== Info ==
== Info ==

Revision as of 17:15, 13 January 2020

(Items in the above list that are marked with an asterisk have my notes in them)

Back to: The Surprising Power Of Liberating Structures
Liberating Structures Graphic Menu
Liberating Structures Matching Matrix



Move from either-or to robust both-and solutions

This process seeks to address the possibility of opposites existing simultaneously when teams are at work.

  • Will our purpose be best served by increased local autonomy, customization, competition, and freedom among units/sites?
  • Or, will our purpose be best served by increased integration, standardization, and control among units/sites? Or, both?

Steps

  1. Use 1-2-4-All to generate a list of activities that require attention by asking, “Where is there tension between our desire to standardize and the request for more customizing or autonomy?” 10 min.

Info